What sort of country do we want to become? Ian McDonald skrifar 11. maí 2023 07:31 The Icelandic government has undergone a shift in priorities over the past few years. Not too long ago, the welfare and wellbeing of its people were seen as an utmost priority, and everything else existed in order to facilitate that wellbeing. Today, tourists and specifically the money they bring, are valued far more than the lives and livelihood of the people who call Iceland home, and furthermore those people now exist mostly to facilitate the wellbeing and comfort of those wealthy tourists. The government likes to claim that the vast amounts of money brought in by tourism will naturally trickle down and wash over the population, bringing prosperity to all it touches. This might be a reality in a fair and just system, or one where the biggest industries are not owned by a tiny handful of people and their families. In that reality, the riches only get concentrated in a few hands and then squirreled away offshore to avoid scrutiny from the tax office. The end result of this kind of a system is for Iceland to end up as a place just like Monaco. One which is hugely expensive, and where the vast majority of jobs are in the service industry, whose workers cannot even afford to live in the cities which they work, serving the rich who travel there. In these kind of places, the government does not care about high prices for food, housing or transportation because they know that the visiting tourists are happy to pay a premium for the privilege of visiting. Therefore there is no incentive to lower costs. Lower prices mean lower profits. Conversely, the workers are forced to pay these extortionate prices because they have no other choice. They are trapped in a system where they spend their entire paycheck just to survive. If the Icelandic government wants to live up to its well-polished, massaged image of equality and a high standard of living, which it likes to portray to the rest of the world, they must state clearly that the people who live here are prioritized more highly than tourist dollars, and to act accordingly. We live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. The GDP of Iceland in 2022 was almost 7 percent, which equates to around 25 billion dollars. There is no reason for people to not be able to afford to survive. No excuses. The author is a member of Efling Union. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Kynntu þér reglur ritstjórnar um skoðanagreinar. Senda grein Kjaramál Kjaraviðræður 2022-23 Ian McDonald Mest lesið Þegar að náttúruvernd fer úr tísku Halla Hrund Logadóttir Skoðun 48 manna stjórn – er þess virkilega þörf? Harpa Hildiberg Böðvarsdóttir Skoðun Þið eruð trömpistar ... sagði orkuráðherra Kristín Helga Gunnarsdóttir Skoðun HMS vill dýrari byggingar Eggert Guðmundsson Skoðun Þau sem eftir sitja Auður Erla Gunnarsdóttir Skoðun 20 kíló af þjóðarskömm Hjálmtýr Heiðdal Skoðun Hvað gerist þegar ótti er endurtekinn nógu oft til að fordómar fari að líta út eins og heilbrigð skynsemi? Inga V. Henriksen Bergdal Skoðun Getur maður dansað sig út úr depurð? Guðjón Ágústsson Skoðun Frjósemisvarðveisla; Jafnt aðgengi að framtíðinni Ragnhildur Þóra Hafsteinsdóttir Skoðun Má segja að börn á Íslandi hafi það gott? Hjördís Eva Þórðardóttir Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Getur maður dansað sig út úr depurð? Guðjón Ágústsson skrifar Skoðun Vinnuvernd er líka sjálfsvígsforvörn Carmen Maja Valencia skrifar Skoðun Á allt Ísland heima á höfuðborgarsvæðinu? Hjálmar Bogi Hafliðason skrifar Skoðun Reykjanesundrið - næsti kafli Berglind Ragnarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Ekkert að spila um Sigurður Hallur Jónsson skrifar Skoðun HMS vill dýrari byggingar Eggert Guðmundsson skrifar Skoðun Þegar að náttúruvernd fer úr tísku Halla Hrund Logadóttir skrifar Skoðun Þið eruð trömpistar ... sagði orkuráðherra Kristín Helga Gunnarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Konur fjárfestum! Iða Brá Benediktsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hvað gerist þegar ótti er endurtekinn nógu oft til að fordómar fari að líta út eins og heilbrigð skynsemi? Inga V. Henriksen Bergdal skrifar Skoðun 48 manna stjórn – er þess virkilega þörf? Harpa Hildiberg Böðvarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Má segja að börn á Íslandi hafi það gott? Hjördís Eva Þórðardóttir skrifar Skoðun Þau sem eftir sitja Auður Erla Gunnarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Bókun 35 borgar ekki reikningana Elliði Vignisson skrifar Skoðun Háskólar eiga að leggja áherslu á árangur, ekki fólk Aðalbjörn Jóhannsson skrifar Skoðun Von er ekki aðgerð Hermína Gunnþórsdóttir,Sigrún Helga Snæbjörnsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Kílómetragjald á umönnun Alma Ýr Ingólfsdóttir,Guðmundur Ármann Pétursson,Stefanía Hulda Marteinsdóttir,Vigdís Gunnarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Við erum náttúran – náttúran er við Harpa Fönn Sigurjónsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Frjósemisvarðveisla; Jafnt aðgengi að framtíðinni Ragnhildur Þóra Hafsteinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Byggjum upp netöryggisgetu og fögnum áfangasigrum Hrannar Ásgrímsson skrifar Skoðun Menntun þarf ekki að þýða tekjutap Ólína Kjerúlf Þorvarðardóttir skrifar Skoðun Kostir og gallar Schengen Aðalsteinn Júlíus Magnússon skrifar Skoðun 20 kíló af þjóðarskömm Hjálmtýr Heiðdal skrifar Skoðun Hvað breyttist þegar þjóðin sagði nei? Hilmar Kristinsson skrifar Skoðun Stjórnun gervigreindar og öryggi Marinó G. Njálsson skrifar Skoðun Hafrannsóknastofnun vissi af gloppunni en gerði ekkert Þórólfur Júlían Dagsson skrifar Skoðun Reikningurinn sem svefninn getur ekki borgað Grétar Þór Guðjohnsen skrifar Skoðun Er þetta allt sama tóbakið? Ólafur Stephensen skrifar Skoðun Danski bærinn Akureyri Gunnar Salvarsson skrifar Skoðun Píeta samtökin í 10 ár Hildur Eir Bolladóttir skrifar Sjá meira
The Icelandic government has undergone a shift in priorities over the past few years. Not too long ago, the welfare and wellbeing of its people were seen as an utmost priority, and everything else existed in order to facilitate that wellbeing. Today, tourists and specifically the money they bring, are valued far more than the lives and livelihood of the people who call Iceland home, and furthermore those people now exist mostly to facilitate the wellbeing and comfort of those wealthy tourists. The government likes to claim that the vast amounts of money brought in by tourism will naturally trickle down and wash over the population, bringing prosperity to all it touches. This might be a reality in a fair and just system, or one where the biggest industries are not owned by a tiny handful of people and their families. In that reality, the riches only get concentrated in a few hands and then squirreled away offshore to avoid scrutiny from the tax office. The end result of this kind of a system is for Iceland to end up as a place just like Monaco. One which is hugely expensive, and where the vast majority of jobs are in the service industry, whose workers cannot even afford to live in the cities which they work, serving the rich who travel there. In these kind of places, the government does not care about high prices for food, housing or transportation because they know that the visiting tourists are happy to pay a premium for the privilege of visiting. Therefore there is no incentive to lower costs. Lower prices mean lower profits. Conversely, the workers are forced to pay these extortionate prices because they have no other choice. They are trapped in a system where they spend their entire paycheck just to survive. If the Icelandic government wants to live up to its well-polished, massaged image of equality and a high standard of living, which it likes to portray to the rest of the world, they must state clearly that the people who live here are prioritized more highly than tourist dollars, and to act accordingly. We live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. The GDP of Iceland in 2022 was almost 7 percent, which equates to around 25 billion dollars. There is no reason for people to not be able to afford to survive. No excuses. The author is a member of Efling Union.
Hvað gerist þegar ótti er endurtekinn nógu oft til að fordómar fari að líta út eins og heilbrigð skynsemi? Inga V. Henriksen Bergdal Skoðun
Skoðun Hvað gerist þegar ótti er endurtekinn nógu oft til að fordómar fari að líta út eins og heilbrigð skynsemi? Inga V. Henriksen Bergdal skrifar
Skoðun Kílómetragjald á umönnun Alma Ýr Ingólfsdóttir,Guðmundur Ármann Pétursson,Stefanía Hulda Marteinsdóttir,Vigdís Gunnarsdóttir skrifar
Hvað gerist þegar ótti er endurtekinn nógu oft til að fordómar fari að líta út eins og heilbrigð skynsemi? Inga V. Henriksen Bergdal Skoðun