Protecting the Welfare State: A Cautionary Tale from the UK to Iceland Ian McDonald skrifar 25. júlí 2023 10:01 I write the following as a response to Bjarni Benediktsson stating that he wants to continue the sale of Íslandsbanki, in addition to the privatisation of many other state-owned institutions. As a concerned citizen who fled the UK seven years ago to escape the tragic consequences of rampant privatisation, I feel compelled to raise the alarm as I witness a familiar pattern emerging in Iceland. Privatisation, with its potential to devastate once-strong welfare states, is a deeply concerning issue that must be addressed and rectified before it's too late. The lessons learned from my home country's mistakes should serve as a stark warning to Iceland and other nations tempted by the siren song of profit-driven governance. The United Kingdom, once renowned for its robust welfare state, found itself in the clutches of an ideology that prioritized profit over people. The relentless push for privatisation stripped vital public services, such as healthcare, education, and transportation, from the hands of the government and placed them into the control of private entities, often to disastrous effect. The consequences were felt deeply by the most vulnerable members of society, as these changes disproportionately impacted low-income families and the marginalized. The British experience with privatisation revealed that when essential services are subject to the whims of the free market, the primary focus becomes maximizing shareholder returns rather than ensuring the well-being and happiness of the population. The human cost of this shift was nothing short of devastating. Critical services, once considered sacrosanct, were plagued by inefficiencies, reduced accessibility, and inflated costs. Privatised institutions became less accountable to the public and more beholden to shareholders, leaving citizens voiceless and at the mercy of profit-driven motives. I am filled with apprehension as I see Iceland seemingly falling into the same trap. If the same pattern of privatisation is repeating itself in this country, there is a real danger of witnessing the erosion of the strong welfare state that has long been a source of pride for Icelanders. The cherished social safety net, which has provided care and support to those in need, is at risk of being torn apart and auctioned off to the highest bidder. It is essential for Icelanders to heed the warnings from across the ocean and reflect on the mistakes made in the UK. Consider who stands to benefit from these changes, and who will be left behind? Can we guarantee that essential services will remain accessible and affordable for all citizens? How can we ensure that profit motives do not supersede the public interest? Rather than blindly following the path of privatisation, Iceland has the opportunity to take a different route—one that prioritises collective well-being, inclusivity, and a commitment to strengthening its welfare state. This means exploring innovative ways to improve public services, enhancing efficiency, and seeking alternative solutions that place people rather than profit at the heart of decision-making. As an outsider looking in, I implore Icelanders not to let history repeat itself. Learn from the mistakes of others, stand together to protect the foundations of the country, and ensure that the interests of the people remain at the forefront of any policy decision. Only through unity and a commitment to shared values can Iceland forge a path that leads to a brighter, fairer, and more prosperous future for all its citizens. Let us avoid the nightmare that comes with the ruins of privatisation, and instead, build a society where compassion, solidarity, and a strong welfare state are cherished and preserved. Sjálfstæðisflokkurin, and Bjarni Benediktsson more specifically, are fully, idealogically comitted to the privatisation and sale of as many cherished and important Icelandic institutions as possible, in as short a time as possible. The recent interview in which Bjarni Benediktsson laid out his hopes and plans was not accidental. It was perfectly calculated. If this goes to pass, he gets what he wants and privatises huge swathes of Iceland, he will point to this interview and say "...well I did warn you..." Do not ignore this warning, or forget about it in the next news cycle. An ideological project is ongoing, and it is the duty of Icelanders to stop it. I just hope that they do before it is too late. The author is a member of Efling Union. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Sendu okkur póst. Senda grein Ian McDonald Mest lesið Skattaferðalandið Ísland Björn Ragnarsson Skoðun Lýðræði eða hópeinelti? Margrét Pétursdóttir,Þórarinn Haraldsson,Þórdís Guðjónsdóttir,Sigurveig Benediktsdóttir Skoðun Öryggisgæslu í Mjódd, núna, takk fyrir! Helgi Áss Grétarsson Skoðun Erum við ennþá hrædd við Davíð Oddsson? Magnús Árni Skjöld Magnússon Skoðun Ríkisstjórnin ræðst gegn launafólki og atvinnulausum Finnbjörn A. Hermannson Skoðun Eru álverin á Íslandi útlensk? Guðríður Eldey Arnardóttir Skoðun Einkavæðing orkunnar, skattasniðganga og lífeyrissjóðir Ögmundur Jónasson Skoðun Er þetta virkilega svarið frá Þjóðkirkjunni? – þegar barn þarf að flýja úr helgidóm Hilmar Kristinsson Skoðun Saman getum við komið í veg fyrir slag Alma D. Möller Skoðun Skjáheimsókn getur dimmu í dagsljós breytt Auður Guðmundsdóttir Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Borgarstefna kallar á aðgerðir og fjármagn Ásthildur Sturludóttir skrifar Skoðun Skjáheimsókn getur dimmu í dagsljós breytt Auður Guðmundsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Eru álverin á Íslandi útlensk? Guðríður Eldey Arnardóttir skrifar Skoðun Öryggisgæslu í Mjódd, núna, takk fyrir! Helgi Áss Grétarsson skrifar Skoðun Erum við ennþá hrædd við Davíð Oddsson? Magnús Árni Skjöld Magnússon skrifar Skoðun Saman getum við komið í veg fyrir slag Alma D. Möller skrifar Skoðun Lýðræði eða hópeinelti? Margrét Pétursdóttir,Þórarinn Haraldsson,Þórdís Guðjónsdóttir,Sigurveig Benediktsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Blóðtaka er ekki landbúnaður Guðrún Scheving Thorsteinsson,Rósa Líf Darradóttir skrifar Skoðun Svar til stjórnunarlegs ábyrgðarmanns frá Keflavík Soffía Sigurðardóttir skrifar Skoðun Ríkisstjórnin ræðst gegn launafólki og atvinnulausum Finnbjörn A. Hermannson skrifar Skoðun 764/O9A: Kannt þú að vernda barnið á netinu? Anna Bergþórsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Opinberir starfsmenn kjósa síður áminningarskyldu Ísak Einar Rúnarsson skrifar Skoðun Einkavæðing orkunnar, skattasniðganga og lífeyrissjóðir Ögmundur Jónasson skrifar Skoðun Er gervigreindarprestur trúlaus eða trúaður? Björgmundur Örn Guðmundsson skrifar Skoðun Skattaferðalandið Ísland Björn Ragnarsson skrifar Skoðun Til hamingju Víkingur Heiðar! Halla Hrund Logadóttir skrifar Skoðun Sjálfbærni með í för – Vegagerðin stígur skref í átt að loftslagsvænni framkvæmdum Hólmfríður Bjarnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Þegar krónur skipta meira máli en velferð barna: Ástæður þess að enginn bauð í skólamáltíðir í Hafnarfirði Jón Ingi Hákonarson skrifar Skoðun Líf eftir afplánun – þegar stuðningur gerir frelsið raunverulegt Steinunn Ósk Óskarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Á hvorum endanum viljum við byrja að skera af? Davíð Már Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Þegar krónur skipta meira máli en velferð barna Jón Ingi Hákonarson skrifar Skoðun Bakslag í opinberri þróunarsamvinnu Gunnar Salvarsson skrifar Skoðun Fyrirmyndar forvarnarstefna í Mosfellsbæ Kjartan Helgi Ólafsson skrifar Skoðun Hvernig léttum við daglega lífið þitt? Einar Geir Þorsteinsson skrifar Skoðun Kína mun ekki bjarga Vesturlöndum að þessu sinni Sæþór Randalsson skrifar Skoðun Er þetta virkilega svarið frá Þjóðkirkjunni? – þegar barn þarf að flýja úr helgidóm Hilmar Kristinsson skrifar Skoðun Átta mýtur klesstar inn í raunveruleikann - hvað er satt og hvað er logið um gervigreindina? Sigvaldi Einarsson skrifar Skoðun Glerbrotin í ryksugupokanum Kristín Kolbrún Waage Kolbeinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Túrverkir og hitakóf – má ræða það í vinnunni? Já endilega! Katrín Björg Ríkarðsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Draghi-skýrslan og veikleikar Íslands Pawel Bartoszek skrifar Sjá meira
I write the following as a response to Bjarni Benediktsson stating that he wants to continue the sale of Íslandsbanki, in addition to the privatisation of many other state-owned institutions. As a concerned citizen who fled the UK seven years ago to escape the tragic consequences of rampant privatisation, I feel compelled to raise the alarm as I witness a familiar pattern emerging in Iceland. Privatisation, with its potential to devastate once-strong welfare states, is a deeply concerning issue that must be addressed and rectified before it's too late. The lessons learned from my home country's mistakes should serve as a stark warning to Iceland and other nations tempted by the siren song of profit-driven governance. The United Kingdom, once renowned for its robust welfare state, found itself in the clutches of an ideology that prioritized profit over people. The relentless push for privatisation stripped vital public services, such as healthcare, education, and transportation, from the hands of the government and placed them into the control of private entities, often to disastrous effect. The consequences were felt deeply by the most vulnerable members of society, as these changes disproportionately impacted low-income families and the marginalized. The British experience with privatisation revealed that when essential services are subject to the whims of the free market, the primary focus becomes maximizing shareholder returns rather than ensuring the well-being and happiness of the population. The human cost of this shift was nothing short of devastating. Critical services, once considered sacrosanct, were plagued by inefficiencies, reduced accessibility, and inflated costs. Privatised institutions became less accountable to the public and more beholden to shareholders, leaving citizens voiceless and at the mercy of profit-driven motives. I am filled with apprehension as I see Iceland seemingly falling into the same trap. If the same pattern of privatisation is repeating itself in this country, there is a real danger of witnessing the erosion of the strong welfare state that has long been a source of pride for Icelanders. The cherished social safety net, which has provided care and support to those in need, is at risk of being torn apart and auctioned off to the highest bidder. It is essential for Icelanders to heed the warnings from across the ocean and reflect on the mistakes made in the UK. Consider who stands to benefit from these changes, and who will be left behind? Can we guarantee that essential services will remain accessible and affordable for all citizens? How can we ensure that profit motives do not supersede the public interest? Rather than blindly following the path of privatisation, Iceland has the opportunity to take a different route—one that prioritises collective well-being, inclusivity, and a commitment to strengthening its welfare state. This means exploring innovative ways to improve public services, enhancing efficiency, and seeking alternative solutions that place people rather than profit at the heart of decision-making. As an outsider looking in, I implore Icelanders not to let history repeat itself. Learn from the mistakes of others, stand together to protect the foundations of the country, and ensure that the interests of the people remain at the forefront of any policy decision. Only through unity and a commitment to shared values can Iceland forge a path that leads to a brighter, fairer, and more prosperous future for all its citizens. Let us avoid the nightmare that comes with the ruins of privatisation, and instead, build a society where compassion, solidarity, and a strong welfare state are cherished and preserved. Sjálfstæðisflokkurin, and Bjarni Benediktsson more specifically, are fully, idealogically comitted to the privatisation and sale of as many cherished and important Icelandic institutions as possible, in as short a time as possible. The recent interview in which Bjarni Benediktsson laid out his hopes and plans was not accidental. It was perfectly calculated. If this goes to pass, he gets what he wants and privatises huge swathes of Iceland, he will point to this interview and say "...well I did warn you..." Do not ignore this warning, or forget about it in the next news cycle. An ideological project is ongoing, and it is the duty of Icelanders to stop it. I just hope that they do before it is too late. The author is a member of Efling Union.
Lýðræði eða hópeinelti? Margrét Pétursdóttir,Þórarinn Haraldsson,Þórdís Guðjónsdóttir,Sigurveig Benediktsdóttir Skoðun
Er þetta virkilega svarið frá Þjóðkirkjunni? – þegar barn þarf að flýja úr helgidóm Hilmar Kristinsson Skoðun
Skoðun Lýðræði eða hópeinelti? Margrét Pétursdóttir,Þórarinn Haraldsson,Þórdís Guðjónsdóttir,Sigurveig Benediktsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Sjálfbærni með í för – Vegagerðin stígur skref í átt að loftslagsvænni framkvæmdum Hólmfríður Bjarnadóttir skrifar
Skoðun Þegar krónur skipta meira máli en velferð barna: Ástæður þess að enginn bauð í skólamáltíðir í Hafnarfirði Jón Ingi Hákonarson skrifar
Skoðun Líf eftir afplánun – þegar stuðningur gerir frelsið raunverulegt Steinunn Ósk Óskarsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Er þetta virkilega svarið frá Þjóðkirkjunni? – þegar barn þarf að flýja úr helgidóm Hilmar Kristinsson skrifar
Skoðun Átta mýtur klesstar inn í raunveruleikann - hvað er satt og hvað er logið um gervigreindina? Sigvaldi Einarsson skrifar
Skoðun Túrverkir og hitakóf – má ræða það í vinnunni? Já endilega! Katrín Björg Ríkarðsdóttir skrifar
Lýðræði eða hópeinelti? Margrét Pétursdóttir,Þórarinn Haraldsson,Þórdís Guðjónsdóttir,Sigurveig Benediktsdóttir Skoðun
Er þetta virkilega svarið frá Þjóðkirkjunni? – þegar barn þarf að flýja úr helgidóm Hilmar Kristinsson Skoðun