Who mediates the mediator? Ian McDonald skrifar 6. febrúar 2023 16:31 I write this article as a direct response by the courts, forcing Efling to hand over their membership lists to the state mediator, in order for him to facilitate a union-wide vote on a contract. The courts allowing the mediator to do this sets a terrifying precedent for any future negotiations and for workers rights in Iceland at large. We exist in a time where people around the world are engaged in strike actions and labor organising, because we understand that for far too long we have been given nothing but scraps while the richest in society grow fat from our labor. There is an understanding and a wider sentiment that asking nicely for a living wage does not work any more. Therefore we are forced to exercise our basic right to withhold our labor. It is the only leverage we have. And with that leverage comes the ability to not merely ask for a little more, just enough to tide us over until the next round of negotiations, all the while profits continue to skyrocket and we lose out. No. It means that we have the rare opportunity to ask for a meaningful, substantial, life-changing change to our situation. That is what we on the negotiations committee of Efling have been engaged with for the past 4 months or more. Our position from the outset has been that any agreement which is less than the current level of inflation is NOT a real-terms pay raise. We know this because we on the committee are workers and Efling members, who live every day seeing our wages get chipped away, and the profit from that ends up in the hands of somebody like Halldór Benjamín, who sits and tells us that we should accept less. And now, Aðalsteinn, the state mediator (who has a long and troubling history of working closely with Halldór Benjamín) has decided that we as a union should be forced to vote on the exact same contract which SA have been trying to shove down our throats since day one. Understand this. The scope and remit of the state mediators power means that he could have proposed a union-wide vote on anything. It could have equally been a vote on the first Efling proposal, or some kind of middle ground. But no. He is forcing a vote on something that ONLY favors SA and corporate profits, At the expense of the workers. This goes to show that the state mediator has had no plans to actually do as his job title suggests and find some middle ground which both parties can agree to. He has handed Samtök Atvinnulífsins everything they wanted on a silver platter. This would be bad enough on its face, but for the courts to now intervene and demand that Efling hands over confidential member information, in order to facilitate this sham? That should set off giant ringing alarm bells for anybody watching this who has a modicum of decency, shame, or empathy for working folk. Unfortunately, there are those in society who hate Efling, who despise it's leadership, and would see us fail. Put aside those feelings, and understand that if Efling loses, workers lose. It is as simple as that. We have a prime minister who is asleep at the wheel, we have a criminal for a finance minister who has made no secret of his desire to end union membership, and now we have a state mediator who has shown willing to undermine the one and only tool which workers have for protection. Stand with workers. Now more than ever. The author is an immigrant worker in manufacturing in Iceland and member of the Efling negotiations committee Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Sendu okkur póst. Senda grein Kjaraviðræður 2022-23 Kjaramál Mest lesið Grafarvogur framtíðar verður til Sara Björg Sigurðardóttir Skoðun Halldór 05.07.2025 Halldór Baldursson Halldór Málþófið um veiðigjöldin vekur miskunnsama Samverja Sigurjón Þórðarson Skoðun Ágætu fyrrum samstarfsaðilar á Þjóðminjasafni Íslands Uggi Jónsson Skoðun Stærðfræðikennari sem kann ekki að reikna? (Og getur ekki lært það!) Brynjólfur Þorvarðsson Skoðun Sumargjöf Þórunn Sigurðardóttir Skoðun Menntastefna 2030 Guðmundur Ingi Kristinsson Skoðun Ráðherra gengur fram án laga Svanur Guðmundsson Skoðun Vonarsvæði fyrir framtíðina – ábyrgð stjórnvalda kallar á verndun Huld Hafliðadóttir,Heimir Harðarson Skoðun Gagnsæi og inntak Halldóra Lillý Jóhannsdóttir Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Fjögurra daga vinnuvika – nýr veruleiki? Sigvaldi Einarsson skrifar Skoðun Ráðherra gengur fram án laga Svanur Guðmundsson skrifar Skoðun Hagkvæmur kostur utan friðlands Jóna Bjarnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Gagnsæi og inntak Halldóra Lillý Jóhannsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Sumargjöf Þórunn Sigurðardóttir skrifar Skoðun Hannað fyrir miklu stærri markaði Hjörtur J. Guðmundsson skrifar Skoðun Grafarvogur framtíðar verður til Sara Björg Sigurðardóttir skrifar Skoðun Málþófið um veiðigjöldin vekur miskunnsama Samverja Sigurjón Þórðarson skrifar Skoðun Menntastefna 2030 Guðmundur Ingi Kristinsson skrifar Skoðun Ágætu fyrrum samstarfsaðilar á Þjóðminjasafni Íslands Uggi Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Ferðamannaþorpin - Náttúruvá Þóra B. Hafsteinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Vonarsvæði fyrir framtíðina – ábyrgð stjórnvalda kallar á verndun Huld Hafliðadóttir,Heimir Harðarson skrifar Skoðun Laxaharmleikur Jóhannes Sturlaugsson skrifar Skoðun Lýðræðið í skötulíki! Lilja Rafney Magnúsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Stærðfræðikennari sem kann ekki að reikna? (Og getur ekki lært það!) Brynjólfur Þorvarðsson skrifar Skoðun Íslendingar greiða sama hlutfall útgjalda í mat og Norðurlöndin Margrét Gísladóttir skrifar Skoðun Til varnar jafnlaunavottun Magnea Marinósdóttir skrifar Skoðun Heimaþjónusta og velferðartækni: Lykillinn að sjálfbæru heilbrigðiskerfi Auður Guðmundsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Barnaræninginn Pútín Gunnar Hólmsteinn Ársælsson skrifar Skoðun Um þjóð og ríki Gauti Kristmannsson skrifar Skoðun Málfrelsi og mörk þess á vettvangi lýðræðisins Helga Vala Helgadóttir skrifar Skoðun Sjókvíaeldi á Íslandi fjarstýrt með gervigreind frá Noregi Ingólfur Ásgeirsson skrifar Skoðun „Finnst ykkur skrýtið að ég mæti á Austurvöll – Pabba mínum var fórnað á altari niðurskurðar“ Davíð Bergmann skrifar Skoðun Hvers vegna skipta hagsmunir verslanakeðja meira máli en öryggi barna í Ásahverfi Reykjanesbæ? Ólafur Ívar Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Kjarnorkuákvæðið: Neyðarhemill en ekki léttvægt leikfang popúlista Kristinn Karl Brynjarsson skrifar Skoðun Stjórnarandstaðan er vannýtt auðlind Jón Daníelsson skrifar Skoðun Ef Veðurstofan spáði vitlausu veðri í 40 ár, væri það bara í lagi? Björn Ólafsson skrifar Skoðun Hægri sósíalismi Jón Ingi Hákonarson skrifar Skoðun 5 ára vegferð að skóla framtíðarinnar – eða ekki! Björgmundur Örn Guðmundsson skrifar Skoðun Ójafnvægi í jöfnunarkerfinu Anna Sigríður Guðnadóttir,Halla Karen Kristjánsdóttir,Lovísa Jónsdóttir skrifar Sjá meira
I write this article as a direct response by the courts, forcing Efling to hand over their membership lists to the state mediator, in order for him to facilitate a union-wide vote on a contract. The courts allowing the mediator to do this sets a terrifying precedent for any future negotiations and for workers rights in Iceland at large. We exist in a time where people around the world are engaged in strike actions and labor organising, because we understand that for far too long we have been given nothing but scraps while the richest in society grow fat from our labor. There is an understanding and a wider sentiment that asking nicely for a living wage does not work any more. Therefore we are forced to exercise our basic right to withhold our labor. It is the only leverage we have. And with that leverage comes the ability to not merely ask for a little more, just enough to tide us over until the next round of negotiations, all the while profits continue to skyrocket and we lose out. No. It means that we have the rare opportunity to ask for a meaningful, substantial, life-changing change to our situation. That is what we on the negotiations committee of Efling have been engaged with for the past 4 months or more. Our position from the outset has been that any agreement which is less than the current level of inflation is NOT a real-terms pay raise. We know this because we on the committee are workers and Efling members, who live every day seeing our wages get chipped away, and the profit from that ends up in the hands of somebody like Halldór Benjamín, who sits and tells us that we should accept less. And now, Aðalsteinn, the state mediator (who has a long and troubling history of working closely with Halldór Benjamín) has decided that we as a union should be forced to vote on the exact same contract which SA have been trying to shove down our throats since day one. Understand this. The scope and remit of the state mediators power means that he could have proposed a union-wide vote on anything. It could have equally been a vote on the first Efling proposal, or some kind of middle ground. But no. He is forcing a vote on something that ONLY favors SA and corporate profits, At the expense of the workers. This goes to show that the state mediator has had no plans to actually do as his job title suggests and find some middle ground which both parties can agree to. He has handed Samtök Atvinnulífsins everything they wanted on a silver platter. This would be bad enough on its face, but for the courts to now intervene and demand that Efling hands over confidential member information, in order to facilitate this sham? That should set off giant ringing alarm bells for anybody watching this who has a modicum of decency, shame, or empathy for working folk. Unfortunately, there are those in society who hate Efling, who despise it's leadership, and would see us fail. Put aside those feelings, and understand that if Efling loses, workers lose. It is as simple as that. We have a prime minister who is asleep at the wheel, we have a criminal for a finance minister who has made no secret of his desire to end union membership, and now we have a state mediator who has shown willing to undermine the one and only tool which workers have for protection. Stand with workers. Now more than ever. The author is an immigrant worker in manufacturing in Iceland and member of the Efling negotiations committee
Vonarsvæði fyrir framtíðina – ábyrgð stjórnvalda kallar á verndun Huld Hafliðadóttir,Heimir Harðarson Skoðun
Skoðun Vonarsvæði fyrir framtíðina – ábyrgð stjórnvalda kallar á verndun Huld Hafliðadóttir,Heimir Harðarson skrifar
Skoðun Stærðfræðikennari sem kann ekki að reikna? (Og getur ekki lært það!) Brynjólfur Þorvarðsson skrifar
Skoðun Íslendingar greiða sama hlutfall útgjalda í mat og Norðurlöndin Margrét Gísladóttir skrifar
Skoðun Heimaþjónusta og velferðartækni: Lykillinn að sjálfbæru heilbrigðiskerfi Auður Guðmundsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun „Finnst ykkur skrýtið að ég mæti á Austurvöll – Pabba mínum var fórnað á altari niðurskurðar“ Davíð Bergmann skrifar
Skoðun Hvers vegna skipta hagsmunir verslanakeðja meira máli en öryggi barna í Ásahverfi Reykjanesbæ? Ólafur Ívar Jónsson skrifar
Skoðun Kjarnorkuákvæðið: Neyðarhemill en ekki léttvægt leikfang popúlista Kristinn Karl Brynjarsson skrifar
Skoðun Ójafnvægi í jöfnunarkerfinu Anna Sigríður Guðnadóttir,Halla Karen Kristjánsdóttir,Lovísa Jónsdóttir skrifar
Vonarsvæði fyrir framtíðina – ábyrgð stjórnvalda kallar á verndun Huld Hafliðadóttir,Heimir Harðarson Skoðun